Zamieszczamy poniżej ogłoszenie o konkursie dla studentów oraz doktorantów realizujących badania z zakresu neuropsychologii, które otrzymaliśmy dzięki uprzejmości Prof. Emilii Łojek.
The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) and the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) are jointly sponsoring a yearly competition for the best scholarly manuscript based on a student project. The winner will be announced at the AACN annual meeting (starting in 2016). The first-prize winner will receive a $1000.- monetary award, and two runner-ups will receive $500.- each. TCN is accepting eligible submissions effective immediately.
ELIGIBILITY:
• Manuscripts must be a result of a student project (e.g., Master’s thesis, dissertation, prelim/comp project, honors' thesis, etc.).
• Student contestant must be the first, as well as the corresponding, author. It is encouraged (but not mandatory) that faculty advisors co-author the manuscript.
• At the time of the initial submission, student contestant must either still have a student status, OR must be no more than 1 year past earning doctoral degree. This must be clearly stated in the cover letter accompanying the submission.
• Manuscripts must be consistent with the Aims and Scope of TCN (http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journalCode=ntcn20#.VS_hcZOPbfc)
• Manuscripts must follow TCN submission guidelines and format.
• Authors must indicate that their submission is a competition entry by checking the appropriate box during the electronic submission process (i.e., answering “yes” to the question “Is this submission eligible for the TCN/AACN Student Project Contest?”).
• Original research, meta-analyses, critical reviews, and case studies are all eligible.
SELECTION CRITERIA: Only manuscripts that have successfully undergone the regular peer-review process and have been deemed appropriate for publication in TCN can be selected as winners. Winners will be selected from among articles that are accepted for publication in a given year (May 1-April 29). Following the successful peer-review process, eligible articles will be reviewed by the AACN Student Affairs Committee (SAC) and judged based on the fit with the following criteria:
• The topic of the manuscript is timely and important.
• Manuscript clearly articulates (in the introduction and the discussion, as appropriate) its clinical relevance and its contribution to evidence-based practice.
• Relevant literature is reviewed in appropriate depth and breadth.
• The employed method and statistical analyses are particularly rigorous, innovative, parsimonious, elegant, or otherwise notable.
• Manuscript has the potential to have direct impact on clinical practice.
• During the review process, the author was responsive and thorough when addressing reviewer suggestions.
Yana Suchy, Ph.D. | Editor-in-Chief Elect The Clinical Neuropsychologist
Professor
Department of Psychology
Utah Brain Institute and Center on Aging
University of Utah
380 S. 1530 E., Rm. 502
Salt Lake City, UT, 84112
Voice: 801-585-0796
FAX: 801-581-5841
Email: Ten adres pocztowy jest chroniony przed spamowaniem. Aby go zobaczyć, konieczne jest włączenie w przeglądarce obsługi JavaScript.